"An inferior assitant, as of a bricklayer.".
#Mos 6502 emulator in minecraft driver#
"An unbooked passenger whom a stagecoach driver picked up along the way so that he might appropriate the fare.". "A conductor of an omnibus"? well, good to know. (recovering politician! Hahaha! Well, I had to look up cad in the dictionary, to make sure it meant what i thought it did, and I found a few other meanings that I was unaware of. Whoa! Simulator/CAD! I simulate a cad, frequently, but that is an entirely different story. seems "glitchy" or finicky? Maybe I must get used to it first? Cheers! Need about 32 KB and that is possible, if one believe the youtube vid titles. Here's a link or two (rudimentary, but we are having fun).
I keep trying to steer the lessons away from minecraft and into the world. PandaPro (contemplating a "handle", name-change) and I have been playing with redstone. but James Janesicks' "Charge Coupled Devices" got a hold of me! divided my attention!). Have downloaded the pics and dusted off my Weste and Eshraghian textbook (It would have helped if I had read and understood it the fuirst time. I might get ambitious and follow through the logic of the layout as posted on visual6502 website. I know, I can search just as good as you can, and shame on me for being lazy. Thanks for tolerating my speculative penchant. I might have to get a separate graphics processor, and maybe THAT could share the main bus with the 65816? That seems reasonable? Well, clearly, I have homework to do. Maybe psuedo-SRAM? "Page" SRAM? Ahhh, I dunno. Maybe I need DRAM? Not sure I have the skill to use Asynch. Not a very relaxing "REM sleep"! Also, human eye is foveated, so a downsample of periphery is possible (though I think I should resist using this option). So, 16 hours, 300kp *18 sensors (binocular 9 sensors per eye), * 30 fps * 60s/min *60 min/hr * 16 waking hours, and well, 1.5 Terabytes/day. My robot will sleep for 8 hours, like normal people do. (I could collect 30 fps, but analyze only 5, or so frames, so the robot can act in real time, but "remember" recent history too?!) But I need to cache the data, till the 65816 has a chance to "sort through it". I might be mistaken, but I think the vsync and hsync signals they send out could be utilized to generate some of the WE/, OE/, and/or CS signals. The VGA sensors feed the data and are, essentially, microprocessors, in and of themselves (they are just dedicated to high output!). I'd hate to go "x86" on you guys?ĭoes DMA implement with anything other than the Intel 8237 chip? How well does it "mesh" with the 65xx family? (I am searching the message board, as we speak/I write!). The data load is (seems?) oppressive (for a 65816), but there must be a caching mechanism or bus architecture that will allow me to use it. I am making a (anthropomorphic/retinomorphic) robot eye, and stitching together 9 (18 eventually) VGA image sensors. I have never built a computer from scratch, but I got halfway through and stalled (holiday season? or brain-stumped? I don't know which?). parallel computing? multi-processor? I am sure it has many names!) in my (copyright circa 2000) Barry Brey "Intel Microprocessors" textbook, and I think that this model seems more promising for my project. I have been reading about "Shared Bus Architecture" (i.e. But, I need a "tool" to get me to the "right answer" on a project I am doing, and for all of the promise of DMA, I am starting to think its not right for my project. My ears, literally, perk up when I see the phrase. Right now I am VERY interested in DMA and can't get enough of it.
I mostly hack it until I give up, but a few projects have functioned. Well, Friday, I am afraid I don't know much about actually rolling up the sleeves and making electronics and computers work. Heard about it first when watching Rodney Brooks (roboticist, of late-1990s, MIT fame) on TV, but can't remember the "catch phrase" that he used? But hooking a few 65C02s or 65816s together, along with banked ROM and maybe a DMA controller could outperform the 328 easily.Īnyone else interested in distributed computing? I play mostly with the Commodore 64, so when I hear talk of what a 6502 can do, I tend to assume at 1 MHz, which would give a pretty excruciating Minecraft experience, probably no matter how many of them you managed to get working together.
This sort of thing interests me greatly, as does distributed computing. The 328 is more limited in built-in memory, though, and expansion solutions are not convenient or fast at all. So overall, maybe 2x power of an '816? Don't know, just guessing. Not looking at the specs right now, but I think the 328s go up to 16Mhz, and most of the instructions take a single cycle.
#Mos 6502 emulator in minecraft software#
The software is open-source, so maybe it can be ported? If the Atmega328 can do it, a 6502 probably can.
0 kommentar(er)
